Evaluare clinică SGS: Rezultatele după 28 de zile de utilizare a măștii Ledmina

SGS Clinical Evaluation: Results after 28 days of using the Ledmina mask

There is a fundamental difference between a product that promises results and one that demonstrates them. The Ledmina mask underwent an independent evaluation protocol conducted by SGS — one of the largest testing and certification laboratories in the world, present in over 115 countries. No testimonials. No before/after photos. Data measured with precision instruments, analyzed by dermatologists.

01 — MethodologyHow the evaluation protocol looked

Participants used the Ledmina mask daily, under normal use conditions, for a period of 28 consecutive days. The evaluation was designed to eliminate subjectivity and produce reproducible data.

Protocol parameters

Duration 28 consecutive days
Participants 33 adult subjects
Evaluation type 1 Instrumental — precision probes
Evaluation type 2 Dermatological — professional visual analysis
Evaluation type 3 Participant self-assessment
Laboratory SGS-CSTC, Guangzhou

Measured parameters included: skin radiance, elasticity, firmness, color, melanin content, erythema content, skin thickness and density. Images were analyzed for pigmentation and wrinkles in three areas: the nasolabial fold, eye area, and cheek.

02 — Key ResultsFigures after 28 days

All values below represent instrumentally measured changes from the initial value (D0), statistically confirmed as significant differences.

+11.8%
Increase in skin density
+11.1%
Increase in skin radiance
+10.8%
Increase in skin elasticity
−14%
Reduction in pigmented area
−8%
Reduction in under-eye erythema
−10.1%
Improvement in skin firmness
Measured changes — skin parameters
Skin density
+11.82%
Skin radiance
+11.13%
Skin elasticity
+10.78%
Skin firmness
+10.12%
Skin thickness
+1.17%
Reduction of pigmentation and melanin
Pigmented area
−14.04%
Under-eye erythema
−8.02%
Skin melanin
−3.85%
Under-eye melanin
−3.11%

03 — WrinklesReduction of wrinkles in three facial areas

Wrinkles were analyzed through image capture and digital processing in three distinct areas: the nasolabial fold, under-eye area, and cheek. The results reflect statistically significant reductions.

Under-eye
−28%
Number of wrinkles
Cheek
−18%
Number of wrinkles
Nasolabial fold
−4.76%
Wrinkle volume
Under-eye
−11.5%
Wrinkle area
Cheek
−10.3%
Wrinkle volume
Cheek
−10.1%
Wrinkle area

04 — Acne-Prone SkinDermatological evaluation of skin lesions

Acne evaluation was performed by dermatologists, not through self-assessment. Lesions were counted and classified before and after 28 days of use.

−19.87%
Reduction in the number of pimples — statistically significant difference
−19.75%
Reduction in total skin lesions
−66.67%
Reduction in pustules (small absolute number)

05 — What participants feltSelf-assessment after 28 days

In addition to instrumental measurements, participants evaluated their own experience. All 5 categories showed significant differences from the initial value.

Significantly improved
Perceived skin firmness
Significantly improved
Perceived skin elasticity
Significantly improved
Skin radiance
Significantly reduced
Severity of pigmentation
Significantly reduced
Under-eye circles and redness
Significantly reduced
Overall wrinkle grade

06 — CredibilityWhy it matters that it comes from SGS

SGS is not a marketing laboratory. It is a global inspection and certification organization whose reports are recognized by regulatory authorities, hospitals, and manufacturers in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries.

An SGS efficacy report is not obtained by filling out a form. It is obtained through rigorous testing, reproducible measurements, and independent dermatological analysis.

The data does not come from a satisfaction survey. It comes from objective instrumental measurements, performed before and after 28 days of continuous use, evaluated by dermatology specialists.

— SGS Independent Evaluation Report
ℹ️ Full certification and testing documents are available upon request. The results refer to the tested participant group and do not guarantee identical results for every user.
Back to blog